Remoción del colorante industrial azul de metileno utilizando el alga parda Fucus Vesiculosus

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19136/jeeos.a8n1.5676

Keywords:

Alga parda; Biosorción; Colorantes

Abstract

El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la eficiencia de remoción del colorante azul de metileno (AM), utilizando como biosorbente alga parda Fucus vesiculosus (sargazo vesiculoso). Se caracterizó el alga mediante la determinación del punto cero de carga. Se consideraron los efectos de los siguientes parámetros sobre la eficiencia de remoción del colorante: pH y temperatura del medio acuoso, concentración del colorante, tiempo de contacto, así como la dosis de biomasa. Se encontró que las condiciones óptimas de remoción del colorante fueron para los valores de pH entre 8 y 12. Se obtuvo una eficiencia de remoción del 92.8% a un pH de 12. El alga parda removió mejor el AM conforme aumentó la temperatura. A una temperatura de 60 °C se logró una eficiencia de remoción del 72.5%. Los resultados mostraron que el comportamiento de adsorción fue mejor descrito por el modelo de Langmuir. El alga Fucus vesiculosus presentó una capacidad máxima de adsorción de 555.56 mg/g del colorante. Con respecto a la cinética de adsorción, los datos obtenidos mostraron un buen ajuste a ambos modelos (pseudo primer y segundo orden). La cantidad óptima de biomasa fue de 0.1g y con ella se logró remover el 99.1% de AM.

Author Biographies

  • D.M. Polanco-Gamboa, Universidad Autónoma del Carmen

    Universidad Autónoma del Carmen * Av. Aviación por 56, Campus "José Ortíz Ávila", Col. Benito Juárez. CP 24180, Cd. del Carmen, Campeche, México

  • M.T. Olguín-Gutiérrez, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares

    Av. Aviación por 56, Campus "José Ortíz Ávila", Col. Benito Juárez. CP 24180, Cd. del Carmen, Campeche, México

  • M. Abatal, Universidad Autónoma del Carmen

    Universidad Autónoma del Carmen * Av. Aviación por 56, Campus "José Ortíz Ávila", Col. Benito Juárez. CP 24180, Cd. del Carmen, Campeche, México

References

[1] Bhatia D., Sharma N. R., Singh J. & Kanwar R. S. (2017). Biological methods for textile dye removal from wastewater: A review, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 20(06), 1–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1393263.

[2] Hernández K. M., Fuentes C. E., Cano J. R., Flores J. & Cruz A. (2020). Adsorción de colorantes provenientes de los residuos acuosos de la industria textil con hidróxidos dobles laminares de MgFeAl, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Revista Tendencias En Docencia e Investigación En Química, 6(6), 1–2.

[3] Khan A. A., Kumari S., Chowdhury A. & Hussain S. (2018). Phase tuned originated dual properties of cobalt sulfide nanostructures as photocatalyst and adsorbent for removal of dye pollutants, ACS Applied Nano Materials, 1(7), 3474–3485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b00656.

[4] Singh J., Kumar V., Kim K. H. & Rawat, M. (2019). Biogenic synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using plant extract and its prodigious potential for photocatalytic degradation of dyes, Environmental Research, 177, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108569.

[5] Cako E., Gunasekaran K. D., Cheshmeh Soltani R. D. & Boczkaj G. (2020). Ultrafast degradation of brilliant cresyl blue under hydrodynamic cavitation based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), Water Resources and Industry, 24, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2020.100134.

[6] Celso-Gonçalves A., Zimmermann J., Schwantes D., Tarley C. R. T., Conradi Junior E., Henrique-Dias-de Oliveira V., Campagnolo M. A. & Ziemer G. L. (2021). Renewable Eco-Friendly Activated Biochar from Tobacco: Kinetic, Equilibrium and Thermodynamics Studies for Chlorpyrifos Removal, Separation Science and Technology, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2021.1890776.

[7] Liu Q., Yang J., Li H., Ye J., Fei Z., Chen X., Zhang Z., Tang J., Cui M. & Qiao X. (2021). Activated carbon prepared from catechol distillation residue for efficient adsorption of aromatic organic compounds from aqueous solution, Chemosphere, 269, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128750.

[8] Rahimian R. & Zarinabadi S. (2020). A review of Studies on the Removal of Methylene Blue Dye from Industrial Wastewater Using Activated Carbon Adsorbents Made from Almond Bark, Progress in Chemical and Biochemical Research, 3 (3), 251-268. https://doi.org/10.33945/SAMI/PCBR.2020.3.8.

[9] Khajavian M., Wood D. A., Hallajsani A. & Majidian N. (2019). Simultaneous biosorption of nickel and cadmium by the brown algae Cystoseria indica characterized by isotherm and kinetic models, Applied Biological Chemistry, 62(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-019-0477-6.

[10] Hannachi Y. & Hafidh A. (2020). Biosorption potential of Sargassum muticum algal biomass for methylene blue and lead removal from aqueous medium, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 17(9), 3875–3890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02742-9.

[11] Brinza L., Geraki K., Breaban I. G. & Neamtu M. (2019). Zn adsorption onto Irish Fucus vesiculosus: Biosorbent uptake capacity and atomistic mechanism insights, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 365, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.009.

[12] Lebron Y. A. R., Moreira V. R. & de Souza Santos L. V. (2021). Biosorption of methylene blue and eriochrome black T onto the brown macroalgae Fucus vesiculosus: equilibrium, kinetics, thermodynamics and optimization, Environmental Technology, 42(2), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1626914.

[13] Yadav M., Thakore S. & Jadeja R. (2022). Removal of organic dyes using Fucus vesiculosus seaweed bioadsorbent an ecofriendly approach: Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic studies, Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, 4, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2021.12.003.

[14] Schwarzenbach R. P., Gschwend P. M., & Imboden D. M. (2003). environmental organic chemistry (Second, Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey.

[15] Liang J., Xia J. & Long J. (2017). Biosorption of methylene blue by nonliving biomass of the brown macroalga Sargassum hemiphyllum. Water Science and Technology, 76(6), 1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.343.

[16] Shehab A. I., Abdel Basir S. M., Abdel Khalek M. A., Soliman M. H. & Elgemeie G. (2019). Dye Removal from Aqueous Solution by Regenerated Spent Bleaching Earth, International Journal of Chemical and Materials Engineering, 13(9), 452-461.

[17] Moreira V. R., Lebron Y. A. R. & Santos L. V. S. (2019). Fucus vesicuolsus surface modification for enhaced biosorption of methylene blue: equilibrium studies.

[18] Foroutan R., Mohammadi R. & Ramavandi B. (2019). Elimination performance of methylene blue, methyl violet, and Nile blue from aqueous media using AC/CoFe2O4 as a recyclable magnetic composite, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(19), 19523–19539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05282-z.

[19] Jafari H., Mahdavinia G. R., Kazemi Heragh B., Javanshir S. & Alinavaz S. (2020). Basic dyes removal by adsorption process using magnetic fucus vesiculosus (Brown algae), Journal of Water and Environmental Nanotechnology, 5(3), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.22090/jwent.2020.03.006.

[20] Çinar M., Işlek Coşkun Y. & Deniz Çift Çi T. (2018). Removal of five cationic dyes using a resin coated with nickel/nickel boride nanoparticles, Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 42(2), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.3906/kim-1706-63.

[21] Chandrasekhar S., Pramada P.N. (2006). Rice husk ash as an ad-sorbent for methylene blue-effect of ashing temperature, Adsorption, 12, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-006-0136-1

[22] Patil S., Renukdas S., Patil N. (2011). Removal of methylene blue, a basic dye from aqueous solution by ad-sorption using teak tree (Tectona grandis) bark powder, Int. J. Environ. Sci. 1(5) 711–725.

[23] Ong S.T., Keng P.S., Lee S.L, Leong M.H. & Hung Y.T. (2010). Equilibrium studies for the removal of basic dye by sunflower seed husk (Helianthus annus), Int. J.hys. Sci, 5(8) 1270–1276.

[24] Ferrero F. (2007). Dye removal by low cost adsorbents: Hazelnut shell in comparison with wood saw dust, J. Hazard. Mater, 142, 144–152.

[25] Hormaza F. A. & Suárez-García E. (2009). Estudio del proceso de biosorción de dos colorantes estructuralmente diferentes sobre residuos avícolas, Rev Soc Quím Perú, 75(3), 329-338.

[26] Ofomaja A. E. & Ho Y. S. (2007). Equilibrium sorption of anionic dye from aqueous solution by palm kernel fibre as sorbent, Dyes and Pigments, 74(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.01.014.

[27] Aichour A., Zaghouane-boudiaf H. (2020) Single and competitve adsorption studies of two cationic dyes from aqueous mediums onto cellulose-based modified citrus peels/calcium alginate composite, Int. J. Biol. Macromol.154, 1227–1236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.277.

[28] Munagapati A.V.S. & Kim D.S. (2016). Adsorption of anionic azo dye congo red from aqueous solution by cationic modified orange peel powder, J. Mol. Liq. 220, 540–548, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.119.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-10

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULO CIENTÍFICO

How to Cite

Polanco-Gamboa, D., Olguín-Gutiérrez, M., & Abatal, M. (2024). Remoción del colorante industrial azul de metileno utilizando el alga parda Fucus Vesiculosus. Journal of Energy, Engineering Optimization and Sustainability, 8(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.19136/jeeos.a8n1.5676